Equitation Science – Clairety Horsemanship

These 4 Principles will Change how you see your Horse

Listen to this post as a video on YouTube! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3CtB6Cz64Q

The first principles of equitation science is the best place to start when trying to understand your horse. What is a first principle? First principles are the assumptions or concepts behind a scientific theory. Equitation science is based on a few different scientific theories, so we have a few first principles to look at. Understanding these gives you the theoretical base to understand everything else we will talk about on this channel.

Today we will look at the first four ‘first principles’. These are what I call the ‘horse principles’ and they apply to any horse. The second set of ‘first principles’, that I call the ‘training principles’, deal more with the specifics of training. We will look at the those in the next post.

Equitation science is not a horse training or teaching method. It is not copy-written like so many of the popular trainers’ methods today. It seeks to define and study the parts of the relationship between people and horses that can be measured and defined. This includes learning theory, ethology, and biomechanics. Learning theory explains how horses’ brains process information to learn from it, enabling us to train them more effectively. Ethology describes each of the behaviours that horses exhibit, allowing us to understand what is normal and how to care for horses according to their needs. And biomechanics studies how horses move, allowing us to become better riders.

Some aspects of a relationship between horses and humans are difficult to scientifically define, like ‘feel’ and ‘trust’ and ‘respect’ which are words often used in the natural horsemanship methodologies. Some people don’t like that equitation science does not address these things, but they are simply not within the scope of what equitation science seeks to clarify. ‘Trust’ and ‘respect’ cannot be measured scientifically with any kind of empirical experiment, so equitation science does not speak to it. The goal of equitation science is rather to study what is measurable and definable so we can apply it to our daily interactions with horses and make the experience more positive for both us and the horse.

Let’s get into the first principles.

Principle 1: Regard for Human and Horse Safety

Knowing how something works is the first step to using it properly. Take a kitchen knife for instance. A knife can be dangerous if used improperly. If you don’t know which side is sharp, you are likely to cut yourself by accident instead of slicing your cheese. In the same way, if we study how horses work, and how they are different from us, we are less likely to run into dangerous situations.

We know that horses are flight animals. Their preferred reaction to fear is to run away. If they cannot run, they may freeze or fight. Recognizing when a horse is scared and being able to defuse the fear or deescalate the situation keeps you safer, and helps the horse to relax.

One of the biggest parts of planning my lessons is choosing which student gets to ride which horse. Matching rider ability and personality to horse training level and temperament is very important for safety. Ensuring the horses are tacked up correctly and the arena is clear of hazards is also part of my job.

Lastly, confusion worries horses. When a rider gives an ineffective cue, or conflicting cues, the horse becomes confused and this can build up into frustration and unwanted behaviours like aggression, ears back, biting, kicking, bucking, and many more. The goal of every rider and horse lover therefore should be to understand better how horses work from the inside out, giving the horse a sense of security, keeping both horse and rider safer.

Principle 2: Regard for the Nature of Horses

Because horses are horses, they have certain social and welfare needs that we need to do our best to meet.

They require companionship of other horses. They require the ability to forage for food, and to move around. They need to create herd structure (which is very far removed from the old concept of dominance and submission—more on that in another video). And they display pain in very subtle ways that we need to learn to understand.

Our nature is quite different from that of horses, which means they can easily perceive us as a threat. Learning how to move and interact around horses helps to bridge the gap between our two natures.

Principle 3: Regard for Horses’ Mental and Sensory Abilities

Horses are different from humans. They think differently. They have different instincts. They interact with one another differently than they interact with us. Treating a horse like a horse and not like another person is vitally important for their welfare.

When people start thinking that a horse is just another human, they start expecting more of the horse than it is capable of. They begin to expect the horse to read their mind, or to ‘know better’. They begin to attribute their own emotions to the horse, sometimes wrongly attributing unwanted behaviour caused by confusion or pain to the horse ‘being silly’ or ‘trying to annoy me’. The problem with thinking this way is that your reaction to a horse’s behaviour will be shaped by what you think caused it. If you think the horse is trying to annoy you, you might feel justified in punishing it with a slap. What if it was displaying pain-related behaviour? Then your slap could actually escalate the horse’s behaviour rather than put an end to it. If you think your horse should ‘know better’ than to paw at the ground, the onus is no longer on you to make sure that he understands your training. If the unwanted behaviour stems from incomplete training of the ‘stop’ response, then it is your training at fault, and not the horse. You can see how treating a horse like a human can lead to misunderstandings, which can be dangerous.

Treating the horse as less than a horse is equally dangerous. Horses are very intelligent. Assuming that ‘it’s just a dumb horse’ could lead the rider to harsher than necessary, which could cause the horse to begin to shut down, or learn to be helpless. The concept of dominance in horse training is very outdated and should not be used.

The best way to arrive at an accurate conclusion about a behaviour is to ask, ‘what happened?’ And describe the exact physical motions that occurred. For example, if there is a loud noise and your horse spooks, you could say, ‘my horse doesn’t like noises,’ which will leave you at a loss for a solution, as noises happen all the time. Instead, try, ‘there was a loud noise and my horse sped up three steps and turned left sharply two steps.’ Now the solution is obvious: the horse sped up and turned when you didn’t ask, so you simply slow down and turn back.

Principle 4: Regard for Current Emotional States

Understanding your horse’s level of arousal is very important in training. Think of arousal as a scale of 0-9. If your horse is asleep, his arousal level is 0. He’s not thinking about anything, and motivation to do anything is lacking. If it feels like you are flying your horse like a kite on the end of your lead rope, he’s at arousal level of 9. There is no way he can pay attention to you, and is unlikely to learn anything positive. Too much or too little arousal, and learning a task is very difficult. Recognizing where the horse is at the moment and being able to change your behaviour to bring your horse up or down the scale is an important training tool.

Based on their interactions with humans, horses begin to develop either a positive emotional state or a negative one. A positive state is like optimism, where a horse expects things to turn out well and is interested in interacting with humans. A negative state is like pessimism, where the horse expects the interaction to be confusing or unpleasant, and tries to avoid interacting with humans.

Every interaction a horse has is adding to his emotional file. The more positive outcomes the better. These facts can tempt some riders to be too ‘soft’ as they try to make the horse like them. Horses, however, find consistency and predictability to be positive, so when riders begin to ‘bend the rules’ and let the horse do unwanted things, the horse actually experiences negative emotions due to the inconsistency.

Being firm but fair is a good way to think about contributing to a horse’s positive emotional state.

Conclusion

Allowing these four principles to permeate how you think about and interact with your horse will change your relationship for the better!

Research

What is Converse Conditioning?

In science, whenever a phenomenon is observed, it is helpful to give it a name so it is easier to refer to while investigating it. Converse conditioning is a more recently named training phenomenon that has not been studied yet. Let’s explore what it is.

In converse conditioning, a horse learns a new, opposing response to a previously learned cue. For example, if a horse is originally taught to accelerate from rein pressure, as is often the case with race horses, teaching that horse to decelerate from rein pressure would be an example of converse conditioning.

Perhaps when you started handling horses, you expected them to walk when you walked and stop when you stopped. But then you learned a bit more about horse behaviour and realized that would be confusing for the horse because there are some situations where you do not want the horse to move when you do (like saddling up or getting on for example!) and so you trained your horse to only respond to pressure or voice cues and not move when you move—this is another example of converse conditioning.

Both of the above examples were positive ones, where the outcome for the horse’s training is improved consistency and clarity. Converse conditioning also works the other way around.

If a horse is first taught to move quicker from a tap of the spurs, but then the rider changes that cue to mean slow down, the rider using his leg no longer always means acceleration. When to accelerate from leg pressure and when to decelerate will be hard for the horse to distinguish.

Another example of converse conditioning creating confusion or danger is when a horse that knows to decelerate from rein pressure is taught to simply shorten its neck to rein pressure. This may be done to try to have the horse move in a certain posture or frame, but causes confusion for the horse and could put the rider in danger.

So you see that converse conditioning is not necessarily good, nor necessarily bad, but it occurs frequently in horse training. It is therefore a good idea to understand what it is and in what scenario it will be useful and in what situations it may be detrimental.

Can you think of any more examples of converse conditioning? Comment your experiences below!

Research

Positive vs Negative Reinforcement in Horse Training: which is better?

We must begin with a definition of terms. Positive and negative reinforcement are two quadrants of operant conditioning. Positive reinforcement means adding (+) something a horse likes to make a behaviour more likely in future. This could be food or tactile rewards. Negative reinforcement means subtracting (-) something the horse doesn’t like to make a behaviour more likely in future. This is usually pressure, whether psychological or physical.

Among negative reinforcement trainers, there can be an attitude that reward is unnecessary.

Among positive reinforcement trainers, there can be an attitude that any pressure is bad.

Let’s analyze these two approaches and see if we can arrive at an optimal approach to horse training.

There is some research purporting to show that horses trained with positive (+) reinforcement have more optimistic affective states (mood) than horses trained with negative (-) reinforcement (Sankey et al, 2010). However, it must be remembered that during the shaping of a behaviour with positive reinforcement, reward must be withheld so the horse tries something more to achieve the next shaping criteria. This causes frustration, which is a pessimistic affective state. Also in the consolidation of a behaviour trained with positive reinforcement, reward must be moved onto a variable schedule, which can also induce frustration.

In the same study (Sankey et al, 2010), the positive reinforcement group of horses was taught to step back from the handler moving into the horse’s space. This is actually a fundamental example of negative reinforcement, in which the horse’s behaviour of stepping back removed the handler’s proximity. In this way, the study was not looking at ‘pure’ positive reinforcement, so the results cannot support the researchers’ hypothesis.

Indeed, a study of oxytocin levels in horses during foundation training using negative reinforcement found that as horses progressed through training, oxytocin levels increased, showing an increasingly optimistic affective state (Niittynen et al, 2022).

A more balanced view of the use of these two quadrants of operant conditioning, then, is clearly to make use of both. Positive reinforcement has the strength of being highly motivating for the horse especially when a learning task is difficult. Negative reinforcement has the strength of being predictable and controllable so that the horse experiences less frustration during training. A trainer who applies scientific knowledge of horse behaviour and learning, therefore, will be adept at applying both positive and negative reinforcement, which is known as combined reinforcement. In this way, the horse is always reinforced and often rewarded for correct behaviour, speeding up the rate of learning and creating an attachment between horse and trainer in the process. That special relationship between horse and human is, after all, what we are all looking for!

References:

Sankey, C., Richard-Yris, MA., Henry, S. et al. Reinforcement as a mediator of the perception of humans by horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 13, 753–764 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0326-9

Taru Niittynen, Veera Riihonen, Liza R. Moscovice and Sonja E. Koski, Acute changes in oxytocin predict behavioral responses to foundation training in horses, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, (2022) doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105707

Research, Training Traditions

What Equitation Science Can Do for You

If you’re a horse lover, chances are you’ve spent countless hours learning about these majestic creatures. But in your journey, you’ve probably encountered a fair share of conflicting advice—one expert swears by training with treats, while another says they’re a terrible idea. One trainer insists rope halters are the key to success, while another argues they’re too harsh. And then there’s the endless debate about bridles vs. bareback riding with a neck rope.

With so many differing opinions and techniques—from the practices of different disciplines to the personalities of passionate horse people—it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. And here’s the thing: if you’re confused about how to approach training, how can your horse possibly understand what you want from them?

This is where equitation science comes in. It’s not just a set of techniques or trends. Rather, equitation science is the study of how horses think, learn, and respond. It’s about using science to understand your horse’s behavior in measurable ways, breaking down the “why” and “how” behind every action, and offering insight into what works and what doesn’t.

Equitation science provides you with a bird’s-eye view of the horse-human relationship. Instead of getting bogged down in the specific methods of individual training styles, you can begin to see the broader patterns and principles that underlie effective, compassionate interaction with horses. It shows you the true science behind the techniques you already use—perhaps without fully understanding their impact—and helps you improve those techniques.

Unlike a particular training method or discipline, equitation science transcends them all. It’s universal, speaking to every rider and trainer, regardless of their background or approach. And in a world where the horse industry feels divided and under scrutiny, equitation science has the power to bring us together. It offers a shared understanding that can unite trainers, enthusiasts, and professionals across different styles and approaches.

Why is this so important? Because the horse world is currently facing significant challenges—from public perception to internal disagreements. Our practices and the way we communicate with horses are under the microscope, and we need a framework that allows us to address these concerns while fostering positive, sustainable change. Equitation science offers that clarity and unity. I’ve seen firsthand how a deeper understanding of equitation science has helped me improve my own interactions with horses, and I truly believe that when we know better, we do better.

Are you ready to take the next step in your journey with horses? Will you commit to exploring the measurable, scientifically-backed aspects of the horse-human relationship? Equitation science will not only provide clarity amid the confusion but also offer a path forward for positive change in the horse industry.

If you’re unsure where to start, I recommend reading this insightful article on applying equitation science practically (https://clairetyhorsemanship.ca/2022/02/02/can-horse-training-outcomes-be-predictable/). And if you’re looking to deepen your understanding, stay tuned for upcoming audio riding lessons based on equitation science, designed to complement your lessons with your coach (https://clairetyhorsemanship.ca/pocket-riding-coach/).

Take a moment today to explore these resources, and make the commitment to learning what equitation science can do for you—and for your horse.

Uncategorized

What is Equitation Science?

Equitation Science is the measurement and interpretation of interactions between horses and their riders.

— Equitation Science (2010) Andrew McLean and Paul McGreevy

Equitation science is very exciting because it is bringing the advances of the training of most other animals into the horse world. Dog trainers, dolphin trainers, cat trainers almost without exception use Learning Theory.

Horse trainers are stuck in the world of tradition and trial-and-error.

Tradition is not a bad thing. The best horse trainers and riding coaches are already applying the principles of Learning Theory; that is why their training and teaching works. ‘Horse whisperers’, instructors, and the great modern trainers have made huge advances in the availability of horse knowledge.

But this is better.

What we can measure we can track, and what we track we can understand, and when we understand something we can explain it to others.

Equitation science opens up a conversation about how we can ethically use, train, and keep horses without subjecting them to abuse, accidental or not, so the horse industry does not tarnish its reputation.

Coaches can now teach their students how their horse thinks and learns, because when the student understands how the horse thinks about situations, they are much safer and can train the horse to become safer as well.

Trainers can put the tools into their clients’ hands to continue their horses training so the horse’s confusion is reduced and their welfare improved.

Science improves our ability to understand what we do with our horses and how we do it so we can get the best out of ourselves and our horses in the least invasive way possible.